SSM Scores Live
 Loading scores…

The Truth Behind the Gambling: Brendan Sorsby

By now, practically every person who follows college sports closely has seen some part of the Brendan Sorsby saga, whether from the Texas Tech viewpoint, the Cincinnati viewpoint, or the “college sports are dead” viewpoint.

The Brendan Sorsby saga has become a long, winding road defined by ambiguity, viewed differently by Texas Tech fans, Cincinnati Fans, and those who believe the sport is broken. Today’s comments from Sorsby’s agent Ron Slavin of Lift Sports Management ignited the story back into the Cincinnati circles, and the abundance of confusion surrounding this case leads us here. Let’s start with how we got here:

Jan 2, 2026: Sorsby enters the transfer portal and is regarded as the top QB in the entire portal class; he commits to Texas Tech for reported amounts upward of 6 million dollars. This came after a great 2025 campaign, where Sorsby threw for 2800 yards and 27 touchdowns in Cincinnati.

February 25, 2026: Cincinnati sues Brendan Sorsby for a breach of contract, requesting nearly 1 million dollars to be paid back to the school. This amount was listed in the contract Sorsby signed with Cincinnati (a 2 year deal). After he broke this contract, he was required to pay the money back, but did not. In court, attorneys said that this was an employment contract rather than an NIL deal and was not enforceable on NCAA athletes.

March 2026, the NCAA was alerted to the gambling activity of Sorsby. This included at least 40 wagers on Indiana football in September and October 2022, while a member of the team as a redshirt QB. Sorsby stated that: “bets made me feel like I was supporting the team when I was not playing in games, much like fans betting on their hometown teams to win. It was a way to make me feel more connected to my team when I wasn’t playing. I always bet on Indiana to succeed.” – ESPN.

April 14, 2026 – Texas Tech was formally notified of the gambling allegations.

April 27, 2026 – National reporting revealed the gambling probe. Sorsby checked into a 35-day residential treatment program for gambling disorder.

May 2026 – The NCAA issued a permanent ban for Sorsby who then filed a motion in court.

June 8, 2026 – The Temporary injunction was heard and ruled in favor of Sorsby, clearing him to play.

June 2026 – Sorsby, now eligible faced significant backlash from media, as did Tech. Tech’s support remained consistent for Sorsby and they were working hand-in-hand with him to ensure he got the needed treatment. During the media storm, notable programs like Georgia and Nebraska were considering not playing Tech in any sport for the foreseeable future. The Big 12 was considering legal action against Tech as well.

June 15, 2026 – Sorsby declares for the NFL supplemental draft and announced he will be forgoing his NCAA eligibility. He withdrew his lawsuit against the NCAA as well. This was the same day that the Big 12 had filed suit to punish Sorsby. They also requested the Lubbock County District Court to rule on the decision before the season started.

This will mark the first supplemental draft since 2023, and assuming he is picked, he will be the first selection since Jalen Thompson in 2019. The last QB taken was Terrelle Pryor in 2011.

Understanding current NCAA Gambling Rules

Per the NCAA/NYT: In 2023, the rules changed, helping to reduce punishments. However, any player who wagers on their own game/sport at the school they’re in can face permanent ineligibility. If a player is gambling on their sport at another school, they could lose half a year of eligibility. Other betting violations are broken out into tiers:

  • $200 or less: further education required
  • $201-$500: Loss of 10% of a season, and further education
  • $501-$800: Loss of 30% of a season and further education
  • $800 or more: NCAA reinstatement staff to consider punishment (up to permanent ban).

A critical distinction in NCAA gambling policy is the target of the wagers: while betting on non-sanctioned sports—such as the UFC—is generally permissible under current guidelines, the same cannot be said for NCAA-sanctioned events. In Sorsby’s case, his history of betting on non-NCAA sports was a significant factor, but it was not the primary driver of his downfall. Instead, the permanent ban and the resulting public outrage were fueled by his wagers on Indiana football—his own team and sport—combined with the sheer, unprecedented volume of betting activity over his collegiate career.

Where Things Stand Today

Sorsby’s agent, Ron Slavin spoke on air this morning for 105.3 ESPN in DFW: “Cincinnati knew for two years and never said anything or didn’t do anything about it. That’s the part of the story that gets lost”.

A distinct rift has emerged between how sports agencies and university compliance departments define a meaningful intervention. Following Slavin’s public comments charging that Cincinnati ‘did nothing’ to address Sorsby’s gambling issues, sources and subsequent reports indicate that while Sorsby did trigger UC’s backend ProhiBet monitoring system in 2024, the university’s response was strictly bureaucratic—consisting of a compliance interview and mandatory educational modules rather than clinical mental health counseling. To an agency managing a player with a severe addiction, procedural checkboxes can look exactly like doing nothing. However, to a university (and the NCAA), they’re doing everything by the book. This means that this rift is likely to go unresolved publicly.

What we know as fact at this time

Cincinnati received an alert from ProhiBet and followed the letter of the law. Sent him to education, and continued to monitor. Sources have confirmed that much of the gambling was being done on different phones and Sorsby was sending money to people to bet for him. Those kinds of things are clear workarounds in the system and not a fault of IU, Cincinnati, or Texas Tech, but the NCAA. Many people who have been covering the Cincinnati program longer than I have confirmed similar to what many fans say – Cincinnati is going to maintain compliance above all else when it comes to matters with the NCAA, especially with John Cunningham in the AD seat.

Regarding Texas Tech – they were put in an impossible situation here. They are coming off a great run into the Playoffs and a historic season. They were trying to keep that going by bringing in the best player in the transfer portal. After landing him, they were met with a historic roadblock – Sorsby’s gambling problem that they did not know about. Tech complied with the investigations from day one, and while people were upset at them going to war for their guy, many programs at the level would do the same. Look at Ole Miss, LSU, and many other programs who have crossed into the gray area to help give their teams a leg up. Ethics are something we need to bring back in college sports, but it has to start from the top down.

At this time, it’s in the best interest of everyone to move on. There will be football in ~ 90 days, and this season promises to bring some of the best football we’ve seen, and now it won’t be marred with the Sorsby saga playing out until opening day!

💡 Resources for Problem Gambling

If you or a loved one are experiencing warning signs of gambling addiction—such as chasing losses, hiding betting habits, or borrowing money to gamble—reach out for support today:

  • National Problem Gambling Helpline: Call or text 1-800-GAMBLER. This connects you to a network of local resources across the United States.
  • Gamblers Anonymous (GA): A fellowship of individuals who share their experiences to recover from gambling problems together. Find a local or virtual meeting at gamblersanonymous.org.
  • Gam-Anon: Specifically designed to support the spouses, family, and close friends of those affected by problem gambling. Learn more at gam-anon.org.

All helplines are free, strictly confidential, and operational 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.

Sources used in this article:

https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/7235313/2026/04/27/ncaa-gambling-rules-penalties-betting

https://www.espn.co.uk/college-football/story/_/id/48035774/cincinnati-sues-sorsby-1m-exit-fee-texas-tech-transfer

https://www.sportico.com/law/analysis/2026/brendan-sorsby-nil-deal-cincinnati-lawsuit-1234891362

This is an active story. As always, as changes/updates occur, this will be updated.


Discover more from Sansom Sports Media

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Discover more from Sansom Sports Media

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading